adajmk wrote:$64K question - Is a Dyson vacuum worth the extra $$?
I bought a Dyson DC-14 in January. I'd done my homework about what I was getting, waited to have money budgeted, and waited some more to see a good price online. The total amount paid, including shipping, was $319.31. For this price, I am absolutely delighted with what I got. I could have got one for less if I had been willing to buy refurbished; I bought new.
Pre-purchase research results: Dyson vacuums cover a fairly wide price range from around $300 to over $600. Individual models carry not-so-descriptive phrases like "all floors," "animal," and "ultimate." The difference between the low end ("all floors") and the pricier versions of the same model is what attachments and accessories are included. For example, the "animal" models include an attachment with a rotating brush that is supposed to be good at picking up pet hair. My sister has a DC-14 Animal and two cats that shed a lot. I asked about the rotating brush attachment. She never uses it. Her house is spotless. My conclusion: It's not worth paying a premium for the attachments, because my clean-freak sister manages just fine using no more attachments than come with the All Floors model. I also reasoned that because the additional attachments don't store on-board, I'd be less likely to use them.
Price Comparison: In late December, I saw the DC-14 All Floors and one of Dyson ball models on sale at Target for $319. I didn't have the money budgeted, so I missed that sale. By the time I got the money budgeted, I was seeing online prices in the $379 to $399 price range. I sat on my hands for a couple of weeks until I saw an online price of something like $299 plus $20 shipping, and I grabbed that.
Five weeks of results: The Dyson DC-14 is far superior to my old vacuum (now gathering dust the slow way in my basement) in three major ways. First, the suction is much better. That means I don't need to go over the same area as many times. Second, the ease of switching between upright and attachments is far superior to what I had before. That means I actually use the attachments, a lot. My standard of cleanliness has gone up, because it's convenient to extent the wand and take care of the odd cobweb I might see where the wall meets the ceiling. Third, it's much easier to empty the dustbin than it was to change bags on my old vacuum. That means I'm empty the dustbin after each use, since it's easy and I'm not wasting money by tossing a partially full bag. In combination, the ease of use and technical superiority mean I actually use the vacuum more than I used the old one.
I'll give you one striking example of technical superiority. I have a beard, which I trim once a week. Pre-Dyson, beard trimming looked like this: Make sure my bathroom sink is dry. Trim beard over the sink. Comb trimmings out of my beard, and brush as much as I can from my shirt into the sink. Run the Dustbuster to pick up the trimmings, then use a damp kleenex to get what the dustbuster misses. Try to do this just before I'm going to shower anyway, so the shirt with hair on it goes in the laundry and I wash any leftover hairs out of my beard and off my body.
Post-Dyson, trimming the beard looks like this: Pause the vacuuming routine when I get to the bathroom. Trim beard over the dry sink. Remove the telescoping wand, and put the brush attachment on the hose. Run that over my beard, my shirt, and the sink, picking up all the hairs. Put the telescoping wand back in, and continue with the vacuuming routine. There are no leftover hairs to deal with using damp kleenex, laundry, or shower.
Cleaning up after trimming my beard is so much easier with the Dyson than with a Dustbuster that the week I had a bad cold and wasn't up to running the vacuum on the full house, it was still less effort to get the Dyson out just to deal with beard trimming than it would have been to deal with the trimming using the Dustbuster.
So, now that I've sung the praises of the Dyson DC-14, is it worth the money? Assuming that mine will last as well as my sister's has, it is absolutely worth the price I paid. But I also think it's worthwhile to wait for a sale and get one in the low $300's instead of paying list price of $399. Given that the standard attachments that came with the All Floors model are doing fine with picking up cat hair and letting me vacuum under my bed, I don't think it's worth the money to pay extra for the Animal or Ultimate version. And while there's a lot of marketing hype about how easy the Dyson Ball is to maneuver, I don't see how it can possibly be enough better than the DC-14 to justify a $500 price tag.
Bottom line: In think the Dyson is a superior vacuum, and it's worth a premium price; but don't be stupid about rushing out and getting one right now or paying through the nose for accessories that you might not need. Spend some time, look around, and get a good price on what you end up buying. A $300 Dyson will pay for itself in not needing $$ put into bags twice as fast as a $600 Dyson would.
Patzer