lindy wrote:Can you point me to a specific explanation of off-budget accounts somewhere or do I just need to search the forum for related posts? I don't understand why the Visa or car loan would be an off-budget account. When I did a balance transfer on a credit card (fortunately at 0% interest), I set up an account for that card, entered my opening balance, and tracked my payments to it.
I don't have a comprehensive explanation post at my fingertips, but here's
a thread illustrating some of the confusion the on-budget versus off-budget distinction can cause.
In YNAB terms, on-budget and off-budget don't mean precisely what you might expect from general usage in society and discussion of how Congress treats the budget. Essentially, a collection of your accounts will be your budget universe. These are the on-budget account. Whenever money enters or leaves the budget universe, the transaction needs a category so YNAB knows money is coming or going. Within this budget universe, your category balances tell you how many dollars are assigned to which job.
An off-budget account is one that you might want to track in YNAB, but not include in the pile of dollars assigned to jobs. For example, a car loan is usually an off-budget account. It contains negative dollars (a liability) that are not assigned any job. When you make a payment on the car loan, you typically want to record that payment as having a category like Auto:Car Payments. That shows an outflow, or money leaving your budget. If you also track the loan in YNAB, the payment is a transfer from checking to the car loan account. That transfer needs a category in the checking account (to show money leaving the budget) but does not have a category in the car loan account.
Savings accounts may be on-budget or off-budget. You would keep a savings account off-budget if your budget focus is on how much you can "pay" to savings each month. When you transfer money from an on-budget checking account to an off-budget savings account, your budget would show that you "spent" what you budgeted for savings. Using this method, being under budget on the savings category is generally a bad thing.
You would make a savings account on-budget if your focus is on how much you have saved and what jobs that savings is supposed to do. When you transfer money from an on-budget checking account to an on-budget savings account, there is no category in either account because the money is staying in the budget universe. The real action showing what is saved happens on the budget page, where you may budget dollars to Savings:Car Replacement, Savings:Home Improvements, and so on.
My recommendation for new users to leave off-budget accounts out of YNAB entirely is based on reading a lot of posts with a lot of confusion about how to deal with the transfers. If the off-budget car loan and the off-budget savings account are not tracked in YNAB at all, it becomes very simple. A payment on the loan is like the payment of any other expenses and gets a category. A transfer from on-budget checking to off-budget, not-in-YNAB savings is a payment like any other payment and gets a category. This is clean, simple, and leaves your full attention for figuring out how the budget works and how best to set up categories for your situation.
Later, when you have a more solid understanding of the program and the methodology, you could bring the off-budget accounts into YNAB for tracking purposes. At that point, you need to deal with the reminders in Lao-Tzu's signature (see any of his posts in the linked thread).
Of course, if you believe you can handle learning about the program, figuring out your own budget, and figuring out how to deal with on-budget and off-budget accounts all at the same time, you are free to put it all in YNAB and deal with it. The program can handle it. But there are more moving parts to figure out.
Patzer