by jodi » Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:29 pm
Meganne,
I guess it depends on how you look at it. I've got an account set up for my second mortgage, and it's balance keeps going down, so for me, that is how I look at things "over-all". Let's say I budget $200 for my regular payment, in the Household: Second Mortgage category, I make the payment on the first of the month. Now my budget looks like this: budgeted: 200, outflow: 200, remaining:0. Over the month I have $300 dollars extra income, that I record as "inflow" to the "Household: Second Mortgage" category, now my budget looks like this: budget: 200, outflows: -100; remaining: 300. When I send the extra payment, "budgeted: 200, outflow: 200, remainging: 0".
After typing it all out, I can see what you mean about looking at it overall. But it works for me, to "loose" that number in the outflow. My account balance goes down appropriately, and that's how I monitor the progress. What doesn't work for me, is counting "extra" income, as income. It is more likely to be allocated towards something during "whack - a - mole" budgeting if I do it that way. Since it's never in the "budgeted" field, I can't pull it from there if I need to cover something else. It makes it so that if I have to rearrange the budget I must take from a different discretionary category (restaurant or entertainment) to cover the overspending on groceries or utilities, rather than my debt paydown money. (That's how I roll with the punches -- I don't let any of my categories be in the red at the end of the month.)
It's one of the things that I really like about YNAB -- It seems really strict, but it's really flexible, it allows me to do things the way I think, and at the same time, it allows others to do things the way they think.