jemkeith wrote:It works pretty good, but the wifi sync doesn't work and right clicking doesn't work, sometimes. cloud syncing does work, but we have two iPhone's with transactions on them that we can't sync. I was wondering maybe a new version of wine might fix some of these issues. Since mine works pretty good, thanks to you all, I don't want to be a guinea pig.![]()
Thank you all for your work on getting YNAB to work on linux!!!
jemkeith wrote:It works pretty good, but the wifi sync doesn't work and right clicking doesn't work, sometimes. cloud syncing does work, but we have two iPhone's with transactions on them that we can't sync. I was wondering maybe a new version of wine might fix some of these issues. Since mine works pretty good, thanks to you all, I don't want to be a guinea pig.![]()
Thank you all for your work on getting YNAB to work on linux!!!
halfmoonboy wrote:Alrighty, I tried wine1.5. This was the version from the PPA described here: http://www.winehq.org/download/ubuntu/
Checking for updates seemed to work without using winetricks to download wininet. Otherwise, it was not a success, and I cleaned up and reverted to the wine1.4 provided by Ubuntu 12.04. wine1.5 is in beta, so I guess some of this is to be expected.
#1) Upon installation, it wanted to download a windows version of mono to support .NET applications. OK, whatever.
#2) It wasn't happy with the wine-gecko that got installed when I upgrade to wine1.5, so it tried to download that as well. That never seemed to work, and the YNAB update screen was unable to show the changelog, since it didn't have the component to render the HTML.
#3) Right-clicking on an account name still does nothing!
Oh well.
WolverineFan wrote:1) Weird.. YNAB4 isn't mono-based. I vaguely recall that YNAB Pro was .NET based (but didn't work in Mono due to some proprietary math libs they were using)
2) Interesting. That's one of the things I like about 1.4 that the web stuff is a lot more stable than it used to be.
3) I wonder why right-clicking is inconsistent through the app? Maybe they use different handler types depending on the location you click on. Still seems odd though.